Archive for the ‘Implementation Success’ Category

Domtar Espanola wins Uptime Award for Best Asset Health Management Program

Wednesday, December 14th, 2011
Domtar Expanola wins Uptime award for Best Asset Health Management Program

Leaders in the maintenance reliability community met to honor fellow maintenance reliability professionals for their outstanding achievements and to celebrate individual excellence at the Uptime® Magazine Best Maintenance Reliability Program Awards at the International Maintenance Conference held Dec. 5 – 8, 2011.

Ivara customer, Domtar Espanola won Best Asset Health Management Program.

I wanted to highlight one of their leaders, Kim Hunt. Kim spoke in several sessions at the IMC conference and I was so impressed with her passion for establishing a reliability culture. Kim is the Reliability Manager at Domtar’s Pulp and Paper Mill in Espanola, Ontario. She specializes in lubrication, planning, predictive tools, CMMS implementation and the development and implementation of the Ivara EXP condition based asset management program (referred at Domtar as “RDM” – Reliability Driven Maintenance). Kim believes that leadership, commitment, teamwork and persistence are key to Domtar successfully weathering the challenging market conditions.

Congratulations to the team at Domtar.

Link to Uptime Magazine Q&A with the winners… http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/reliabilityweb/uptime_20121201/#/62

SMRP conference, did you go?

Friday, October 21st, 2011

Congratulations to the IPad2 draw winner at the Ivara booth at the SMRP conference: Chris Johnson, Reliability Lead, Ascend Performance Materials.

The SMRP conference is one of the largest Maintenance & Reliability conferences in North America and Ivara is proud to be a part of it. We love to be able to compare Ivara EXP side-by-side to all related products because we are leaders in asset performance management solutions. Once you test-drive Ivara EXP, you’ll understand how it can change the way you work (to make fast and accurate business decisions regarding equipment performance and reliability based on real information, not only on the current performance level of an asset, but also on risk to operations, safety, and the environment). If you didn’t get to see Ivara EXP in action at the SMRP conference, call us anytime to arrange a demonstration over the web…

 

Linked In Group: Ivara EXP and EAM Professionals

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

Join the conversation. Get involved in the Ivara User Group Community growing on Linked In. Learn more about Ivara products and services, pose questions to other group members, tell us the lessons learned in your implementation, give us your tips.

http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=3961095

Planning in a Proactive Maintenance World

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

Quick, how many tasks are in your work backlog?
How many have been done before?
How many standard tasks exist in your system?
How many of those tasks have been formally identified and formally reviewed?
What are the risks and consequences of the asset failing?

…That bad?

Planning has been around as a practice since work was invented. However, most of the effort has been in ‘work avoidance’ (not functional failure avoidance).  There has always been a wishful thinking and crossed fingers approach to Maintenance Management.

Proactive culture indicates that all work/tasks are formally planned. A proactive culture provides early warning or prediction of preventable failures through formal Work Identification methods, ie. RCM, MTA (FMEA), RCA, & PDM. These methodologies can be utilized to ensure your planning efforts correlate to getting to the right work on the right equipment at the right time.

If work is formally identified, prior to the need for a response, then the preventative work/task and/or the proactive corrective work/task are both known and can be planned in advance.  The specific roles and responsibilities of the Planner in a proactive, reliability focused environment are different than in a reactionary breakdown maintenance environment. Planners need to understand the practice of Reliability Centered Maintenance to get to the proactive elements of planning.

Take an RCM course in your area… http://www.thealadonnetwork.com/products-services/public-courses-training/

 

Demonstrate a simple example of reliability and you’ll gain a lot of support

Friday, April 1st, 2011

Look around you. There are so many opportunities to apply common sense reliability principles and gain many untapped benefits. Watch this 8 minute video showing a simple Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) example then think about the possibilities in your plant. Interestingly, this example was ‘stumbled’ across during an RCM2 / MTA facilitator training session. You will see the value of getting Maintenance and Operations together to apply common sense strategies, in this case saving the company $11,000 annually. It’s a great learning tool, too. Just imagine what you could achieve coupling RCM on high risk assets along with MTA, starting with the ‘lowest hanging fruit’ in your plant.

Need to fix Planning and Scheduling before looking at Reliability? Think again…

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

As I visit with many sites across all industries around the country, I continue to hear folks say that they have to fix their planning, scheduling and work order data collection systems before they can go after driving improved reliability. In my opinion, nothing could be further from the truth.

Most organizations today do a poor job of writing out work orders for tasks being done and then providing the needed data after job completion to build a healthy history base. If you think about how long it would take to build a meaningful database, it would take forever to get a solid initiative in place. This is time that most organizations simply do not have.

I believe the key to getting a reliability program underway is to first determine baseline performance data for your most critical equipment that will be key to determining when an asset is starting to function outside of its acceptable boundaries. There are different processes such as Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA)  that allow you to determine this in a very credible way. Once you know what data needs to be looked at, you can then decide how you want this information collected and processed. It can run from simple check sheets done manually or automated using handheld devices all the way up to online data collection and automated condition based monitoring to capture the necessary readings. The trick then becomes how to best analyze, correlate and act on all of this data, often being summarized from of thousands of data points.  If  you are able to look only at the data that falls out of acceptable limits, then it is a lot easier to manage. This is where technology like Ivara EXP comes into the picture.

EXP filters the data and calls your attention to the readings only when necessary and only to those readings that require attention. This in itself is an amazing aid and can save tons of time and resources. With this kind of information being conveyed close to real time to whomever needs to see it, will allow for proactive steps to be taken prior to failure taking place. Hence you have just caught a potential failure prior to it occurring and causing all the time and heartache  that goes along with unplanned downtime. The key to remember is that all of this can be done on your most critical assets in fairly short order. The recorded information that helps you spot and resolve the potential failure also is applied to that historical database (that we started out talking about wanting at the beginning of this posting).

You can and, in fact, should give serious consideration to this approach if you’re looking for timely improvement without taking forever to get started. Improved RELIABILITY can be yours and the gains it brings shared with everyone in the organization in weeks and months, NOT years.

Good luck and enjoy the journey.

Equipment Document Health- A Major Savings Opportunity

Friday, August 6th, 2010

As I visit various industry sites, I look forward to interacting with the shop floor to understand how they feel everything is going. The work ethic is usually very strong and folks ‘get it’. We all need to work smarter, not harder, and strive to improve equipment performance and cost structure.

When commissioning a brand new asset, the focus is very strong on getting it installed, debugged and into production. As we all know, these steps almost always require changes to the design, large and small, obvious and not so obvious. The need for making these changes is understood, but it is critical that all changes become incorporated into their respective equipment documentation records so that a clear history is established as to when and what was done relative to change. With the very complex equipment we’re now using to produce our products, these changes are critical when it comes time to troubleshoot issues and problems, no less train new folks on how the asset operates. Imagine trying to find the source of a problem when the very drawings you’re relying on to help you are out of date. Talk about a blind shot at fixing what’s wrong. Not only does this take much more time away from production due to increased troubleshooting time, but think of the unnecessary aggravation your causing your people as a result of making their jobs that much harder than  need be. 

This issue is found not only around the creation of new assets but is just as common and serious when working on existing equipment. We’re always trying to tweak more out of our existing equipment and this requires changes to be made accordingly. If the appropriate document records are not updated properly, we create a nightmare for the folks trying to care for the equipment. In addition, imagine trying to design the change and not have a clear picture of the current design of the area in which you are working.

As much sense as it makes to keep all of our documents current, it’s been a long time since I visited a site where document maintenance was being practiced. The pain is being self inflicted and only we can resolve this important area of neglect.

Are we really saving any money by not maintaining good equipment document records? I believe we all know the answer.

Go for it and good luck!

Ensure You Have the Right People Involved When You Define Your Maintenance Program

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The only people that can truly define an effective Asset Maintenance Program are those that design, operate and maintain the equipment:

  • Operators and Trades (Crafts)
  • Maintenance and Operations Supervisors
  • Engineers and Equipment Specialists

With the combination of these people, you have the right mix of knowledge to define the proper maintenance and operating strategy for an asset. Ultimately, the success of any new program depends on the buy in of those that execute the program.

For more information on how to effectively define a maintenance program, visit this link

http://www.ivara.com/index.php/services/the-services-we-offer/asset-performance-management-cycle/strategy-development-services/

Maintenance in a mobile world –and still get reliability

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

One of our customers, PG&E, had challenges using a paper-based inspection system covering a 70,000-square-mile service area. They found it very labor intensive, there were lots of duplicate entries, inconsistent inspection criteria, difficult to see trends or identify systemic problems, and there was a general lack of data validation. Many details typically get lost in transcribing from paper to system. It’s hard to see the big picture and takes too long to act on recommendations.

What they did in just 3 months was translate all their paper definitions into Ivara EXP’s mobile application on Panasonic Toughbooks. They have condition indicators, states, task templates, standard tasks plus the definition of the corrective tasks to trigger in SAP. All the corrective work parameters are defined in SAP. They use bar coding to identify equipment being inspected which allows for flexible routing of activity. They insert work instructions for collecting a reading directly on each indicator and use feedback from the field to tune the program.

Reliability has definitely gone mobile at PG&E –they now have visibility to asset data, their SAP work orders, current and historical condition information in a disconnected mode. They are empowered to make fast and accurate maintenance decisions based on accepted best practices and real-time asset health. Here’s a link to their story: http://www.ivara.com/content/PDFs/ivara_expremote_casestudy.pdf .

Jerry Olsen and John Wysocki of PG&E recorded a webinar with all the details of their success… if you want the details on their mobile solution, request it here:

CBM at Pacific Gas & Electric- Ivara EXP & SAP PM enables Mobile Workforce to Achieve Cost-Efficient Reliability & Compliance

Online training session helps customers to continuously improve

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Last week, we held a 3-hour on-line web training session in which customers learned the fundamentals of KPI development for Maintenance and Reliability using Ivara EXP. RCM Practitioner and KPI expert Carlo Odoardi led the session. The Online KPI training session covered everything from the theory of Leading vs. Lagging Indicators to developing KPI dashboards and comparative analyses.  The juiciest part was understanding the Ivara object model structure and finding the right data for specific KPI calculations. Ivara’s new KPI template library was also reviewed.  There was lots of time for Q&A in this interactive session and participants even got a break at about half time, just as if they were in a real classroom. Surveys were sent out after the session to get feedback? Let us know what you think… We are always looking for ways to improve the customer experience…